I’ve been falling behind with posting. I swear I’m going to post more often.
Working with glass plates and contact printing means that you can only make prints the same size as the plate your camera will hold and there is always a desire to go a bit bigger – till things get ridiculous. Things started to get really ridiculous in early February when I saw a camera for sale on the Oxfam website. It was a 10×12 inch Vageeswari. It was very expensive but it came with four, yes that’s right, four double plate holders. The battle with buying old plate cameras is finding matching plate holders. This is especially the case when you are working with dry plates. Wet plate collodion workers only need one plate holder because they can only use one at a time. To have enough to hold eight plates right from the start was wonderful. It needed a home. I wanted to make a donation to Oxfam’s work, especially in Yemen, so I could justify it. Reader, I bought the camera.
Here are a sequence that tell the tail of the first exposure.







Vageeswari was an Indian camera manufacturer. Mr K. Karunakaran set up the company just after the second world war, at about the same time as Indian Independence I guess, to make field cameras in the style of the British (but also Indian made?) Houghton Butcher cameras which were also copied by the Japanese as the Asahi Asanuma field camera. Everyone was copying everyone else in those days. The British companies stopped making old style plate cameras mid century partly because of the war and partly because the technology had moved on but in freshly independent India their was probably still a market for a new, old fashioned camera. I’m sure they were popular with enthusiasts later as well. It appears the Vageeswari Camera Works did very well till it faded out in the 1980s. Mr Karunakaran only died in 2016 at the age of 90 and did much more in life than just this. You can read an obituary here.
From this history we can deduce my camera might be only forty years old but is most likely about seventy. The bellows look like they have been replaced (badly) and the focus mechanism is pretty knackered but just about useable. The important thing from my perspective is that Vageeswari continued to make Victorian style book-form plate holders when the rest of the world moved to ANSI standard sheet film holders. Book form holders are really bad for film but great for glass plates. I now have an Ultra Large Format (ULF) camera with plate holders. This is something that can only be had from very expensive (and very good) bespoke camera makers today.
Famous photographers who use the same camera? I just noticed that Borut Peterlin uses one for his smaller works! Here is an example. Borut’s looks better condition than mine but then he’s a pro.
Now what was it I was going to photograph again?
Roger, its a great blog post and I wish VCW cameras were still made. I used the 10×12, and would like to try the panorama camera also.
I read with interest about your camer just as I am preparing to make use of my panoramic Vageeswari which Chuck is so keen on. A friend of mine is more knowledgeable about cameras that I will ever be so he is going to overhaul it for me before I can expose my first calotype in it. It is a heavy camera and the added lens I was lucky to buy second hand (Tessar 300/4.5) and two plateholders add to the bulk of it. Hopefully it will be ready for action this summer. So let me prey for windless days when I am mounting the Vag on a tripod.
The images are not original vageeswari,VCW is another parallel company during 1950 .Some of the workers started it as a trust in Alappuzha. Instead of Vageeswari logo they put VCW as their name,which resembles Vageeswari,The making and parts on it were not exactly like vageeswari but those who know original vageeswari can easily recognize the lack of finishing finishing,and poor quality compared to vageeswari. Every vageeswari camera has a logo of Vageeswari on the rear frame just above the ground glass
Wow that is really interesting and informative. Thanks. I’ll look out for a real one to compare it.